Piers Morgan is known for his fiery interviews and even fiercer ways. Whether it is Kanye West or just something trendy, Morgan is always on time to give the latest scoop. This time, his target is Fiona Harvey, the woman claiming to be the real-life inspiration for Martha in the Netflix hit ‘Baby Reindeer’.
After Harvey appeared on Morgan’s ‘Piers Morgan Uncensored’ show, a disagreement over her compensation erupted into a social media spat. Additionally, people are not happy with Morgan giving a platform to an alleged criminal.
Related: ‘Baby Reindeer’ On Netflix Is A Deep Dive Into The Psyche Of An Abuse Victim
Real Martha Fiona Harvey Calls Out Piers Morgan Only To Be Mocked By Him
The interview itself was a ratings grab. Harvey dished on her alleged connection to comedian Richard Gadd, the show’s creator, making claims of obsession and stalking. Additionally, The drama drew millions of viewers, likely boosting Morgan’s advertising revenue. However, the payout for Harvey tells a different story. According to Harvey, she was offered a mere £250 for the interview.
When the interview became a hit, Harvey felt shortchanged. “Piddling” is the word she used to describe the initial offer, and she boldly demanded a cut of the show’s takings, going as far as saying she’d “settle for a million.” Morgan, never one to shy away from a fight, took to social media to ridicule Harvey’s demands.
Additionally, He reposted a news article with her million-pound request, adding a sarcastic, “No Fiona.. you want an agent,” along with a laughing emoji. This mocking response has divided viewers. Some side with Morgan, arguing Harvey agreed to the fee beforehand and shouldn’t complain now. Others point out the vast difference between Morgan’s potential earnings and Harvey’s measly £250.
In case you missed it: ‘Baby Reindeer’: Where Is The Real Martha Now? What Does She Think Of The Netflix show?
Is There A Merit to Fiona Harvey Asking For A Million For ‘Baby Reindeer’ Comments?
Harvey’s claim to a million-pound payout might seem outrageous. However, it raises a legitimate question about interview compensation, particularly for non-celebrities. Talk shows often rely on ordinary people with extraordinary stories to generate buzz. While some interviewees might be happy with exposure alone, others might need financial compensation.
This situation highlights the need for transparency in interview fees. Should participants be informed about the show’s potential revenue beforehand? While Harvey’s million-pound request might be a publicity stunt, it has sparked a conversation about fairness and the value a regular person brings to a high-profile interview.
You might like to read:
