Actress Vanessa Marcil isn’t here for the negativity surrounding Megan Fox’s relationship with Machine Gun Kelly. Ever since Megan Fox and Machine Gun Kelly made their relationship public they’ve been scrutinized continuously.
While people were expecting Vanessa to join in on the hate due to their history she had a completely different reaction. Marcil, who shares a son with Fox’s ex-husband Brian Austin Green came to Fox’s defense against online trolls criticizing her personal life.
Vanessa Marcil Speaks In Megan Fox’s Defense And Calls Out The Double Standards
Marcil took to Instagram to express her frustration with the situation. She shared screenshots of hateful comments targeting Fox and her relationship, calling them “stupid” and “transparent jealousy.” Marcil pointed out the glaring double standard when it comes to judging women’s relationships compared to men’s.
Her message questioned why women face such harsh criticism while similar behavior by men is often ignored. “FEMALE TRIBE Are y’all really still out here saying STUPID, TRANSPARENT (jealousy) s—t about each other?” Marcil wrote in her post. “Tearing each other down? Calling each other whores?” This powerful statement highlights the need for women to support each other, especially when facing external negativity.
In case you missed it: Megan Fox Rocks “Shortest Manicure Ever” With A Charming 3D Twist
Vanessa Marcil Standing Up for Women Is What Hollywood Needs
Marcil’s message isn’t just about defending Fox, it’s about advocating for women in general. She encourages women to uplift each other instead of perpetuating negativity. This type of online discourse can be especially damaging when it comes to public figures like Fox.
The reality is, that Fox and Kelly are navigating a relationship in the public eye, and it’s bound to draw scrutiny. But Marcil’s call to action reminds us to be critical of the way we judge women’s choices. Perhaps with more support and less negativity, women like Fox can focus on their personal lives without the constant barrage of online criticism.
You might like to read: